ViolentDesires Women other than me, less dominant, more emotionally unstable and non-specific, also most often do not like non-specific guys. Women who are themselves distant from ESTJ traits can despise guys for lacking ESTJ-like traits. On the principle "I am a woman and I can be feminine, but a man has to be concrete and masculine."
Yes, but for different women, domination is associated with something else. I explained it on the example of my friend@Selena .
Domination as an INTJ would act on it:
Introverted, cold, surgeon, INTJ type, Joseph Mengele.
Cold, reticent, introverted, surgical, thorough, critical.
However, for you such a type would not work so much, to be dominated by the need of an ESTJ just like your breeder. That is, someone more open, extroverted, predatory, typically predatory, life-like, firmly on the ground. And although such an ESTJ would probably also move such a girl - it's not exactly this one“ puzzle” under her, because this puzzle is, for example, just such an INTJ, moreover, she herself has an INTJ guy.
In turn, I noticed that for many ENFJ, ESFJ, ISTJ women, the ISTP guy is also dominant:
ISTP. A silent tough guy. Clint Eastwood. A sensual guy focused on fun, here and now, who likes to walk his own paths. It is this type that you will very often meet on a motorcycle when he dashes in silence and in black glasses into the unknown on your Harley. Classic ISTP.
And this guy is also the dominant type for some women and it is this guy that makes them wet.
So although in general ISTJ or ESTJ guys are the most universal puzzle, so to speak - a puzzle that will suit almost every woman - however, individual types of women have their own more specific preferences.
ViolentDesires Good reading of human characters and intentions is not a good intuition for you?
Well, but at the simplest level, at this animal level, not at a deeper level. You are the type who can read some simple behaviors and interactions related to whether someone wants to attack you, puts a pig on you, etc. It's hard for me to give an example now, but in such more complicated interactions you would not be able to cope with it, because you do not think too deep. Also, in my opinion, you have a poor intuition when it comes to visionary about what has real potential. For example, probably when such a BS forum started its activity, then probably after the first 3-4 months there were not too many people there - and such a typical ESTJ that I know would quickly criticize and short-sightedly:“ Er .. it has no potential” .
This type is short-sighted at life, is weak at perceiving potential, hidden things, which is why there are so few ESTJ innovators or visionaries.
And you know how often it happened to me that, for example, my ESTJ boss judged something hastily without going deeper into what I write. Even today in the chat you judged hastily@hotkitty in my opinion, thinking that he is someone there - you probably meant someone from BS - and I think that he is a completely different person that you do not know, because related only to this forum. I suspect so. And here, in my opinion, you can be completely wrong with a hasty assessment.
The ESTJ is prone to such superficial hasty judgments - it is often effective, but how many blatant mistakes it can make, only I know.
ViolentDesires The question remains, what percentage of these "innovators" are successful and what are not.
Much bigger than Sensors.
There are generally fewer Intuitive types in society than Sensors, and MIMO TO - accompanied by the greatest innovators, the greatest CEOs - is dominated mainly by Intuitive.
Gary Kasparow, Bob Fisher - genius chess players (ENTJ, INTJ), Zuckerberg, Jobs, Gates - INTJ, ENTJ, INTJ / INTP / ENTJ (Gates is differently typed). Musk - INTJ. Einstein INTP. Newton INTJ. Well, generally, do not look for great innovators, CEOs, ESTJs, because… you won't find it.
Well, there are almost no MIMO Sensors among them, that in general there are more Sensors in society.
So while a minority of Intuitive's become great innovators, they are still a larger minority than Sensors, because they're generally not great CEOs or innovators.
ViolentDesires I have the impression that many "in the clouds", non-specific people dealing with MBTI, like to indulge in fantasies about the "magic land of CEO", where people like them are appreciated. Such people do less well in normal life, so they like to fantasize about the fact that despite the fact that in practice they are worse, they are actually better, but they have not been properly appreciated.
But INTJs are real people. The typical type in the clouds is the INFP.
INTJ, ENTJ - these are SPECIFIC people, who, however, are not as down-to-earth as ESTJ, who can use their vision and cloud-rocking in practice.
There was this highest salary chart and the top four were:
ESTJ, ENTJ, ISTJ, INTJ. So as you can see, INTJs or ENTJs are very high - your ESTJs at the most, BUT - these are the results of the society average. It does not change the fact that among the narrow group of the highest earners, there are much fewer ESTJs, and the majority are Musk-type innovators and the rest - i.e. generally INTJs, ENTJs, etc.
ViolentDesires Ok, and who has the better and how is this intuition manifested? 🙂
ENTJ, INTJ have better intuition, because although they can also read people's intentions, they can also read intuitive intentions - and they read them better than sensors. The ENTJ and INTJ are better when it comes to reading N's, because it's their wing in general.
Besides, they also have a better intuition in predicting what their potential is, and I wrote about it earlier.
ESTJ is good at this“ local” intuition - a simple family business, some local restaurants, reading human intentions on the straight plane of some fight, attack.
However, when a big success is involved, such as Facebook, Tesla Motors, etc. - you already have Musks and Zuckerbergs (INTJ)
and not any ESTJs.
ViolentDesires I understand him. If it's ugly, then the other won't like it either. He has a daughter and he seems to be happy in his own way.
Eh, yeah, but I don't think so. Well, hardly anyone is so ugly. If he exercised more and got involved with a slightly uglier woman, it might not be so ugly for her.
It is a question of whether he has his own personal dignity, because there is no other solution - he is, find a woman a little uglier, exercise a little and he could be quite attractive to her.
Well, see for yourself - he swallowed her words and was still in a marriage with a woman who just BRIEF him and gives him mousse sex.
Do you realize what a guest must have in mind to be able to stay in something like this permanently?
How FUCKY GREAT does there have to be a level of de-reality and self-deception?
Here too you had the example of the Obliterator.
A guy with a liliput appearance not even 170 cm tall, and not a short muscle man, but an ordinary guy - such a guy SAINT BELIEVES, HE IS CONVINCED that he really excites his spouse.
Interestingly, he explains it to himself that“ there are different tastes” that she likes a guy like him.
Well… I do not deny that she can like him, value him, love him somehow, but telling yourself that he is physically attracted to her shows how terribly Polish guys generally live in delusions.
ViolentDesires Most Poles are average-looking guys for whom it looks average, not bad.
Yes, but women aren't the kind that average guys are“ on average” they like it. A woman is a binary creature in this aspect.
The average guy for a woman, visually and physically, is just COMPLETELY UNSAPPY. Look at your example - apart from the Breeder, except for some small group, the other guys DO NOT GIVE YOU A LITTLE. It's not like that“ a bit” Warm you that“ a bit” you feel something there. There isn't any bit. In women there is NO‘ A BIT’ when it comes to sexual attraction.
There are guys, we like many women and she can even fuck this 6/10. Women don't. That is why, in most marriages in Poland, a man DOES NOT ATTRACT HIS WOMAN ALMOST AT ALL. Often times, even the blind would notice that they don't warm their women - and they tell themselves it's because of a headache, or because he didn't do this, that.
Guys really live in terrible delusions about their woman, sex, etc.
Am I saying this because I am not doing well on the Polish market?
You see, I am not doing badly on the Polish market, I am just doing NOT AS I WANT.
Such an average Polish 31-year-old is in a relationship with a woman of 29, 30 years old, often of average quality, very often a woman who is sharp and not very nice to such a guy, rather rules him a bit - and this is very, very common.
And guys like that agree to it.
I do not agree at all.
That is why I am not worse off than most Poles, only that I am simply not able to accept the offer they accept.
I would not be able to meet 30-year-olds like my peer friend,“ extractor” from Tinder. I couldn't be with the woman who tells me I'm ugly.
I just couldn't rip off MOST of what Polish guys do, which they agree to without blinking an eye and are still enjoying themselves.